Legal Opinion
Crowell v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 17, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
206 N.J. Super. 298 (1984)
502 A.2d 573
WILLIAM W. CROWELL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Burlington County.
September 17, 1984.
John F. Pilles, Jr. for plaintiff (Schlesinger, Schlosser, Foy & Harrington, attorneys).
Jerem M. Gordon for defendant (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).
HAINES, A.J.S.C.
Nemo protest mutare consilium suum in alterius injuriam.[1]Justinian's Digest, 50, 17, 75, Black's Law Dictionary 1190 (4th Ed. 1968).
The issue here is whether this ancient doctrine thoroughly entrenched in our jurisprudence and known as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Borecki v. Eastern International Management Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Schwartz v. Leasametric, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- DeVries v. McNeil Consumer Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Panzino v. Scott Paper Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988