Legal Opinion
Panzino v. Scott Paper Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 24, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-3526(JFG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
This is an action for wrongful discharge from employment. The three plaintiffs were employed by defendant at its Landisville, New Jersey facility. They were terminated in 1984 as part of Scott’s “reduction in force” at Landisville.
The parties stipulate many of the facts. At the time of their termination, plaintiffs held the position of shift supervisor (Panzino & Fomari) or of area maintenance supervisor (Polak). They had no written employment contract of any kind with the defendant, nor was there a written agreement that plaintiffs would be entitled to “bump” hourly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Carlsen v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan TrustSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Brunner v. Abex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grant v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Rocheux International of New Jersey, Inc. v. U.S. Merchants Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Barone v. Leukemia Society of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Croslan v. HOUSING AUTHOR. FOR CITY OF NEW BRITAINDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Matter of Independent Management Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.