Maxwell Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Santa Fe Public Schools
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge
(specially concurring).
A. The admission into evidence of the regulation was not error.
Defendants contend that “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT ADMITTED PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT 3 INTO EVIDENCE.” The majority of the Court ‘(finds 'that it need not decide whether admission of the State Board of Education regulation was error, because even if error, it was harmless error.
Harmless error vs. prejudicial error needs refashioning.
Two rules are involved:(1) Rule 61, Harmless Error [§ 21—1—1(61), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4)]:
No error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence ... is ground for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Bihn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.