Mercho-Roushdi-Shoemaker-Dilley-Thoraco-Vascular Corp. v. Blatchford

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Mercho-Roushdi-Shoemaker-Dilley-Thoraco-Vascular Corporation (“MRSD”) brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of its motion for preliminary injunction that sought to enjoin Doctors James W. Blatchford III (“Dr.Blatchford”) and Eve G. Cieutat (“Dr.Cieutat”) from violating the non-competition clauses in their respective shareholder and employment agreements. 1

We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred in denying MRSD’s motion for preliminary injunction.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that MRSD is a physician…