Legal Opinion
Doolan v. Doolan Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 15, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-0009, 84-0780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Two separate actions have been consolidated for trial before this court. Both actions arise from the same factual basis. The respective plaintiffs have filed motions for summary judgment, and have agreed to a Stipulation of Facts for purposes of the summary judgment motions only. The parties have stipulated that New Jersey law is controlling. The general background of the cases as set forth in the Stipulation of Facts is as follows.
John H. Doolan and Thomas H. Doolan (“Doolans”), residents of Pennsylvania, entered into a purchase agreement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Idaho Plumbers & Pipefitters Health & Welfare Fund v. United Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Thomas H. Ross Inc. v. SeigfreidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Idaho Plumbers And Pipefitters Health And Welfare Fund v. United Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. MoskowitzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Coutinho Caro & Co., Inc. v. DoolanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985