Legal Opinion
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Moskowitz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2080PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened to the Court by defendant Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (“F & D”) to dismiss all cross-claims for contribution and indemnification which have been or hereinafter may be filed against F & D by codefendants, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion was unopposed. Having considered the submissions of F & D, the Court will grant its motion.
BACKGROUND
The Court is confronted with yet another instance where the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) has had to step into the shoes of an insolvent bank and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Three Garden Village Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Lee A. Everhart v. Drake Management, Inc., Union Commerce, Defendant-Third Party v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ronnau v. Caravan International CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Kindervater v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MoskowitzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Great American Insurance Companies, Inc. v. Subranni (In Re Tri-State Armored Services, Inc.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY v. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID FLEISCHMANN, PCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024