Legal Opinion

State v. Durant

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1993No. C91-09-34850; CA A73867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for aggravated theft in the first degree. ORS 164.057. He assigns error to the denial of his demurrer and his motion for judgment of acquittal and also to the trial court’s failure to give his requested jury instructions. We reverse.

Defendant paid the victim $10,000 for a 40 percent interest in the sports cards, sports memorabilia and profits of a sports card shop. Six weeks after purchasing this interest, defendant staged a burglary and took all the sports cards from the shop. He was charged with aggravated theft and criminal mischief. Before trial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ZinkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Ramahi v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RenshawOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. DollarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. People v. RosenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API