Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Giles v. Sardie
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 27, 2000No. 96-2002 LGB(RCX)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING (1) THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES’S MOTION TO DISMISS [63-1]; (2) THE DIXON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [64-1]; (3) MICHAEL MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS [103-1]; AND (4) SARDIE ET AL.’S MOTION TO DISMISS [124-1].
BAIRD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint of the qui tam action brought by Relator Diane Giles. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action and the complaint sufficiently raises a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, the Court denies the motions.
II.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Stanley v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Peruta v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Rollins v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- SOGETI USA LLC v. ScarianoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.