Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2012No. 2012-0278Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero, 134 Ohio St.3d 311,

2012-Ohio-5457.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CICERO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero, 134 Ohio St.3d 311,

2012-Ohio-5457.] Attorney misconduct, including communicating information received from a prospective client to a third party—One-year suspension. (No. 2012-0278—Submitted September 11, 2012—Decided November 28, 2012.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 11-055. __________________ LANZINGER, J. {¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher T. Cicero of Columbus, Ohio,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API