Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 18, 1943No. 2900PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania.
The defendants are foreign corporations having been incorporated under the laws of a foreign country or of states other than Pennsylvania. All the defendants are authorized to do business in Pennsylvania.
The Pennsylvania Act of Assembly of May 17, 1921, P.L. 682, § 301, 40 P.S. § 421, provides in part as follows :
“Section 301. Requisites for foreign companies to do business. — No stock or mutual insurance company or association of any other State or foreign government shall be admitted and authorized to do business until: *…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giusti v. Pyrotechnic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Di Ciano v. Western Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Standard Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1960
- Ferrante v. Trojan Powder Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.