Legal Opinion
Trundy v. Strumsky
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 19, 1990No. Civ. A. 87-2221-YPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
On September 8, 1987, Christopher C. Trundy (“Trundy”), acting pro se on his own behalf and, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1, as a shareholder derivative action on behalf of National Equity Corporation (“National”), commenced this action against Richard Strumsky, Joanne Strum-sky (together “the Strumskys”), Edward McCormick, Debra McCormick (together “the McCormicks”), Wayne Krupsky (“Krupsky”), and Sidney Dockser (“Dockser”). The complaint alleges as Counts I through V against various of the defendants: a civil violation of the Racketeer Influenced and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberace v. ConwayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Bowdoin Construction Corp. v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, N.ADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Laker v. FreidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994