Legal Opinion

Hocking Valley Products Co. v. Tackett's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. The Hocking Valley Products Company presented a claim against the estate of Marion F. Tackett, deceased, for. goods sold and delivered. The claim was allowed in the probate court, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

A claim was presented against the defendant estate by plaintiff for coal sold and delivered to the “Sherwood Mills” located at Sherwood, Ohio. The coal was ordered by George A. Smith, who was operating the mill. It is the claim of plaintiff that Smith was operating the mill for Mr. Tackett, who was the owner of the property, and that he acted as agent for Tackett in the matter of this purchase. The proofs submitted by plaintiff tended to show that *624George A. Smith was operating the mill as agent for Mr. Tackett. In order to clear the matter up and make it clear that he was, the deposition of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hynes v. HalsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Farmers & Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. De War v. JuettMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lammie v. KlugMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re Ganea's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API