Legal Opinion

Lammie v. Klug

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 37,179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Susie T. Lammie, executrix of the estate of Andrew Lammie, deceased, moved for a summary judgment against Williarii H. Klug on two notes signed by the latter and made payable to plaintiff’s decedent. Defendant filed an affidavit of merits, in which he claimed he became an accommodation maker with Lammie’s knowledge, and that the notes were without consideration. Jonathan A. Zahn, in an accompanying affidavit, stated that he borrowed large sums from Lammie in his lifetime; that, when he tried to obtain additional loans represented by the notes, Lammie told him that, if he would get defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hocking Valley Products Co. v. Tackett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cass v. Washington Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Henning v. LevinMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaunitz v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Doyle v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Roach v. PlankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Panasewich v. PanasewichMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API