Legal Opinion

Hynes v. Halstead

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. Docket No. 132, Calendar No. 39,553PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs, beneficiaries under the last will and testament of William T. Hynes and, except Matthew Shea, his sole heir, filed their bill in equity to set aside a deed from William T. Hynes to Ward Halstead upon the ground of fraud, undue influence, mental incompetency, and want of delivery thereof. Defendant answered, claiming the deed was in all respects valid and asking that the bill of complaint be dismissed. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ bill, and they appeal.

The trial court held the decision of this case turned upon the question of the delivery of the deed alleged to have been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Gray v. . BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Wellborn v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wadd v. . HazeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Noakes v. NoakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Schmidt v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lintner Estate v. MeierMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Blodgett v. SnobbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hooker v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API