Legal Opinion
State v. Mele
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendants, Mele and Assuntino, appeal from judgments of guilty on the ground that the evidence does not support the finding and the finding does not support the conclusion. Certain rulings made during the trial and the length of the sentences are also the subject of complaint.
The finding, with such corrections as can be made therein, is as follows: The Whalley Theater, a small motion picture house, is located on Whalley Avenue in New Haven. It is provided with a burglar alarm serviced by the American District Telegraph Company. It was closed about midnight on March 20, 1938, and there…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. FaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Commonwealth v. LowreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Swits v. SwitsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SoberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- State v. KohlfussSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. MendillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. LaPortaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.