Charles R. Davis v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court summarily denying Appellant Davis’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking administrative credit for presentence custody, which he contends would result in his immediate release.
The trial court’s summary disposition is based upon the proposition that, inasmuch as the relief sought involves the clarification and correction of the judgment of the sentencing court, Section 2255, U.S.C. Title 28 is the exclusive remedy. Ordinarily, we would agree with the trial court. See Brown v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 283 F.2d 670. But where, as here, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stapf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Thomas Patrick SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- William Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas Harry Durkin v. Jack F. Davis, Director, Dept. Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Reanier v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Earl Edward Brotherton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Chambers v. MoseleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1969
- Hazelwood v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.