Legal Opinion

Reanier v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1974No. 42666, 42667, 42668, 42736PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The four petitioners in these consolidated applications for writs of habeas corpus are incarcerated in the penitentiary. They seek credit against their maximum and mandatory minimum terms for pretrial detention served because of their inability to post bail. They do not seek such credit against minimum terms as such may be fixed by the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles within its discretionary power.

After several prior convictions for which he served time and was variously paroled, petitioner Reanier was arrested on March 21, 1966, for second-degree assault in Kitsap County, Washington. He…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Thomas Harry Durkin v. Jack F. Davis, Director, Dept. Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API