Rue v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.
Milas J. Rue, appellant, contracted lead poisoning while in the employ of respondent and filed a claim for compensation under our Workmen’s Compensation Statute. The commissioner found in his favor and made an award for him. The respondent appealed to the circuit court, where, upon presentation of the finding of the commission and the evidence on which such finding was based, the court held no case was made by the claimant and reversed and qiiashed the award of the commission and discharged the defendant. The claimant appealed to this court.
The award of the commission was set aside and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Peru Plow & Wheel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McDaniel v. KerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Daugherty v. City of MonettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
- Phelps Dodge Corporation v. DewittArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Industrial Commission v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.