Legal Opinion

Dayside Inc. v. First Judicial District Court Ex Rel. Carson City

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2003No. 40580PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or certiorari challenges a district court order that granted the real party in interest partial summary judgment on petitioner’s mechanic’s lien foreclosure claim for relief and dismissed the accompanying lien. The district court ruled that a construction contract executed by petitioner and the real party in interest contained an enforceable mechanic’s lien waiver provision. Petitioner now seeks a writ of mandamus or certiorari directing the district court to reverse the partial summary judgment and restore the mechanic’s lien.

We conclude…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Pink v. BuschNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Diaz v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. MidAmerica Construction Management, Inc. v. MasTec North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Bullock Insulation, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Pan v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API