Hermitage Laundry Co. v. City of Nashville
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor
The bill in this cause was filed to attack the validity of an ordinance of the City of Nashville, “No. 1886 — Providing for the licensing of wheeled vehicles. ’ ’ The basis of attack is that the ordinance is in violation of Chapter 18, 3rd Extra Session of the 1937 Legislature, the caption of which is as follows: “AN ACT to declare the driving of all motor vehicles, whether for pleasure or profit, upon the roads, streets or other highways of the State of Tennessee, a privilege to be taxed and regulated by the State of Tennessee exclusively and forbid the taxation or regulation of the same by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rutherford v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Porter v. City of ParisTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Soukup v. SellTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Willis v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Southern Greyhound Lines v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tennessee Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- City of Paris v. Paris-Henry County Public Utility DistrictTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Tusant v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Stuermer v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- City of Chattanooga v. VeatchTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.