Legal Opinion

City of Chattanooga v. Veatch

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peewitt

This was a prosecution commenced by warrant in Municipal Court of the City of Chattanooga, against Mary Kling Veatch for violation of Sections 148 through 155, Article XIX, Ordinance No. 4269, commonly known as The City Sticker Ordinance.

The trial judge was of the opinion that the sections of the ordinance in question contravened Article 11, Section 8, of the Constitution of Tennessee, and dismissed the prosecution.

The Ordinance in question requires an annual license of $5 on each passenger automobile and $2.50 on each motorcycle using the streets of the City of Chattanooga, more than thirty…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Rutherford v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McKelley v. City of MurfreesboroTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Large v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Johnson v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memphis Retail Liquor Dealers' Ass'n v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. S & P ENTERPRISES, INC. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. Drinnen v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Overton Square, Inc. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API