Ehat v. Scheidt
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries which the complaint alleges were inflicted upon him by the defendant.
The action was tried by the court, a jury, having been waived by the parties, and judgment was awarded plaintiff in the sum of $500.
This appeal is by the defendant from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.
The points urged by the appellant against the validity of the judgment and the order are that certain rulings of the court respecting certain evidence were illegal and harmful to the defendant and that certain findings are not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. Mar Gin SuieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Latky v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. BjornsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.