Carstens v. Unemp. Comp. Div.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
This court in Carstens Packing Co. v. Industrial AccidentBoard, 123 P.2d 1001, held that appellant was not a covered employer under the unemployment compensation statute as it existed prior to 1941.1 The present action arises under the emphasized proviso of the amendatory sec. 18-5, chap. 182, 1941 Session Laws, pp. 393-4, which provides:
"The term 'covered employment' shall not include —
"* * *
"(f) Services performed in the employ of an individual owner or tenant operating a farm in connection with the cultivation of soil, the production and harvesting of crops or the raising, feeding or…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Hood v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.