Legal Opinion

Carstens v. Unemp. Comp. Div.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1943No. 7114Published

1Dissent

This court in Carstens Packing Co. v. Industrial AccidentBoard, 123 P.2d 1001, held that appellant was not a covered employer under the unemployment compensation statute as it existed prior to 1941.1 The present action arises under the emphasized proviso of the amendatory sec. 18-5, chap. 182, 1941 Session Laws, pp. 393-4, which provides:

"The term 'covered employment' shall not include —
"* * *
"(f) Services performed in the employ of an individual owner or tenant operating a farm in connection with the cultivation of soil, the production and harvesting of crops or the raising, feeding or…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hood v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  5. Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API