Legal Opinion

Pursell v. First American National Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1996PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether the actions of a bank following repossession of collateral for a loan form the basis for an action under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-101, et seq. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that the bank’s actions did not constitute a violation of the Consumer Protection Act because they did not affect the conduct of any “trade or commerce,” as those terms are defined in the statute. 1

After a careful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Cook v. Spinnaker's of Rivergate, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wilson v. Johnson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. White v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API