Legal Opinion

Strickland v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Wojcik)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2016No. BAP CC-16-1172-KiFPa; Bk. 6:16-13228-SHYPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge:

Appellant Magdelena Strickland, a bankruptcy petition preparer 2 (“BPP”), appeals an order granting the motion of the U.S. Trustee (“UST”) under § 110 3 to disgorge her petition preparation fees and to impose fines and damages, totaling $2,650. We AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. How Debtor and Strickland met

The facts are mostly undisputed. Strickland does not have a law degree, she is not an attorney and she does not work under the supervision of an attorney. She and her husband, who is also not an attorney, own and operate “Low Cost…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re MalekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. In re FarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. In re BrackensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  4. In re: Artem KoshkaldaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. In re: Jordana BaumanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API