Legal Opinion
Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor Atiyeh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1987No. 85-4174PublishedCited by 1,216 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Kim King (King) and Kent Norman (Norman) appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action against the Governor of Oregon, the Attorney General of Oregon, and the Superintendent of the Oregon State Hospital. They contend that the district court erred in ignoring their original complaint after they filed an amended complaint, in dismissing their action against the governor and the attorney general for failure to sue the proper defendant, and in dismissing their action against the superintendent for failure to state a claim.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Denny Lee LONDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,216 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1,211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.