Legal Opinion

In re: Artem Koshkalda

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2020No. NC-20-1050-SGB NC-20-1051-SGBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED DEC 7 2020 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL ORDERED PUBLISHED OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. NC-20-1050-SGB ARTEM KOSHKALDA, BAP No. NC-20-1051-SGB Debtor. (Related Appeals) ARTEM KOSHKALDA, Bk. No. 18-30016 Appellant, v. Adv. No. 18-03020 E. LYNN SCHOENMANN, Chapter 7 Trustee; SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; OPINION EPSON AMERICA, INC., Appellees. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California Hannah L. Blumenstiel, Bankruptcy Judge, Presiding APPEARANCES: Appellant Artem…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API