Huff v. Territory of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Day County; before J. L. Pancoast, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J. :
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district conrt of Day county of the crime of stealing cattle, and was sentenced to seven years’ confinement in the penitentiary. He filed a motion for new trial which was overruled, and he now brings the cause to this court upon a petition in error. Numerous causes are urged in support of the application for a new trial, and we will give them such consideration as their merit demands.
The first contention is that the verdict is not sustained bi’’ the evidence. This is a fruitful field for the defeated litigant,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Peters v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
- Stutsman v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3Cited by18 opinions
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Cummings v. LobsitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bouton v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.