Legal Opinion

Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. Brigham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action to recover upon a promissory note. The plaintiff had a verdict and the defendant alleged exceptions. The time for filing the exceptions was extended and on the last day a bill of exceptions was duly filed. Two days after the plaintiff moved to dismiss them on the ground that the defendants had given it no sufficient notice of the filing of the exceptions. The judge* ruled as matter of law that the motion should be allowed and dismissed the exceptions. The defendants excepted, and the question is whether as matter of law the motion was rightly allowed.

Rule 44 of the Superior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broomfield v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Chertok v. DixMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Day v. McClellanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Dutton v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. John Henry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API