Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Bennett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The only question presented by the plaintiff’s exceptions is, whether the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the defendant’s exceptions “for the reason that the written notice given to counsel for the plaintiff on the day of the fifing of the bill of exceptions in the Superior Court was accompanied only with an unsigned copy of the bill of exceptions and not with a signed copy.” G. L. c. 231, § 113, provides that notice of the fifing of exceptions must be given to the adverse party. A similar provision is found in Common Law Rule 51 of the Superior Court (1923). The notice so…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Ansin v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Ely v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Schmoll Fils & Co. v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Lakeside Manufacturing Co. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Hall v. Horizon House Microwave, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  3. Michelson v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Williams v. Pittsfield Lime & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Port City Construction Co., Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API