Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Hilbun

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided December 7, 1988No. Civ. A. J88-0002(L)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TOM S. LEE, District Judge.

Before the court for consideration is the motion of plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Machel Hilbun has responded to the motion and the court has reviewed the memoranda of authorities together with attachments submitted by the parties.

This is an action by Allstate for declaratory judgment brought pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2201, in which Allstate seeks a determination that it has no liability to Hilbun under the uninsured motorist provisions of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wickline v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Hodges v. Canal Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company v. PooleDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanover Insurance v. PascarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API