Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance v. Pascar

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 6, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), brought a complaint in the Superior Court seeking a declaration pursuant to G. L. c. 231A (1994 ed.), that it was not obligated to pay underinsured motorist benefits to the defendant, Eric Pascar. A judge in the Superior Court considered the case on cross motions for summary judgment, see Mass. R. Civ. P. 56 (a) and (b), 365 Mass. 824 (1974), based on a statement of agreed facts and exhibits. The judge denied Hanover’s motion and allowed Pascar’s motion. In so *443ruling, the judge rejected Hanover’s position that the under-insurance coverage of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Glasser v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Massachusetts Auto Body Ass'n v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. QuaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Murphy v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Genatossio v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  5. Chambers v. MiddlesexCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API