Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Brandt & Lawson Associates, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
Petitioner seeks a permanent stay of a demand made by respondent for arbitration and of any arbitration proceedings pursuant to such demand.
On March 1, 1954 the petitioner entered the employ of respondent under a written contract which contained a restrictive covenant prohibiting petitioner from engaging in competition with respondent for a period of two years after the termination of his employment. The contract also contained a clause for arbitration of any dispute with reference to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
It appears that the employment was terminated on August 22, 1958 so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In Re the Arbitration Between Springs Cotton Mills & Buster Boy Suit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Maflo Holding Corp. v. S. J. Blume, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropolitan Dade County v. RESOURCES RECOVERYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Foley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962