Legal Opinion
Maflo Holding Corp. v. S. J. Blume, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1955PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBubke, J.
The complaint states two causes of action, one for damages and the other for additional rent. In the first the plaintiff charges that the defendant by refusing to permit access pursuant to a provision of a lease, which provided that the defendant as tenant would afford the plaintiff as landlord and its contractor every facility to enter upon the premises, caused the plaintiff to suffer substantial damages. In the second cause of *573action the plaintiff charges that the defendant in violation of the provisions of paragraph 24th of the lease refused to pay as additional rents certain expenses and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hahl v. . SugoNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- De Coss v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Weisman v. Awnair Corp. of Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Giannone v. York Tape & Label, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Griese-Traylor Corp. v. LemmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cruz v. OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.