Kaplan v. Corcoran
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge.
The basic question for review on this appeal appears to be whether the district court1 erred in holding unconstitutional Executive Order 10096, which provides in substance that the United States shall obtain title to any invention made by any Government employee during working hours, or with a contribution by the Government, or which bears a direct relation to, or is made in consequence of, the inventor’s official duties.
Executive Order 10096 was promulgated by then President Harry S. Truman on January 23, 1950, “by virtue of the authority vested- in [him] by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robert W. Heinemann v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Halas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Heinemann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Kaplan v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.