Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haraszthy v. Shandel

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

This controversy grew out of the transactions between one Oppenheimer, and Mrs. Shandel the appellee. Early in 1889, Oppenheimer bought a very considerable quantity of wine and similar goods from the appellants in San Francisco, and settled for them with his acceptances due in *138thirty days. The goods were shipped to Denver and held by the railroad company for the freight and transportation charges. In order to get possession of the goods for the purposes of his business, he negotiated a loan with Mrs. Shandel for enough money to pay these charges and leave himself a small balance. It appeared…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knox v. McFarranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Merchants' Bank v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. McMurtrie v. RiddellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Kinney v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. GumaerColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. BirdColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Burris v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Beaman v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Beaman v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API