Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Wood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to San Miguel County Court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Rising, C.

The defendant in error brought an action in justice’s court against the plaintiff in error to recover the sum of $10 for money loaned, $10 due for board, and $2 for interest on said sums. Case taken to county court by appeal. Upon the trial in the county court, defendant introduced evidence to prove an indebtedness of the plaintiff to him in the sum of $38. The case was tried to the court, and the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for the full amount of his claim and interest.

There are many errors assigned, but counsel for plaintiff in error in his argument relies solely…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. TaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Murphy v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Haraszthy v. ShandelColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Ziegler v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Johnson v. KountzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Hunt v. OhmertzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. LINDSAY v. LINDSAY.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API