Legal Opinion
Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. Bird
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1900No. 1776PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of La Plata County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.
A debt for goods of the value of about $500 is the subject-matter of this action brought by Reid, Murdoch & Company against the Schutt Mercantile Company and Willis E. Bird; The case went off on a nonsuit and we state the facts as we *118find them. What we may say about them is not to be taken as an unquestionable narrative, nor may any of our suggestions be used to influence a jury hereafter.
The case was begun in the county court and afterwards tried in the district court. The Schutt Mercantile Company was a commercial corporation doing business in Durango. It had been transacting business for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Shotwell v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Sillyman v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re J. S. Appel Suit & Cloak Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1912
- Nicholls v. McShaneColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
- Nicholls v. McShaneColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006