Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Brooks

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1972No. 6798PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

This is the second time this case has come before us on appeal. The first appeal was from an order of the district judge granting Minnie Jensen’s Rule 41(b) motion to dimiss the Brookses’ complaint because they had failed to prove their case. We reversed and remanded the case for trial. Brooks v. Jensen, 87 Nev. 174, 483 P.2d 650 (1971). At the second trial the lower court found in favor of the Brookses, from which judgment Minnie Jensen has now appealed.

The Brookses filed this action against Minnie Jensen to establish their right to an easement. The easement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mallett v. Uncle Sam Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Co. v. Old Sandstorm Annex Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brooks v. JensenNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Perry v. Law Enforcement Electronics, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cornell v. GobinNevada Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parsons Drilling, Inc. v. Polar Resources Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tavel v. OlssonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cavell v. CavellNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cavell v. CavellNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Vagabond Hotels, Inc. v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API