Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Gobin

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1925No. 2675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant is not entitled to affirmative relief where no such relief is asked for by way of cross-complaint or counterclaim. Powers v. Van Dyke, 117 P. 797.

Where no legal title is shown in either party, one showing prior possession in himself or grantors has better right. Plaintiff in ejectment may recover against defendant having no better right and who relies solely on later possession or entry. 15 Cyc. 30; Staininger v. Andrews, 4 Nev. 59.

Possession of grantor inures to successor. Southerland, Pl. Pr. 6301.

Right to government land cannot be initiated by trespass. Short v. Read, 30 Nev.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mazzan v. Warden, Ely State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mallett v. Uncle Sam Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Bommer v. American Spiral Spring Butt Hinge Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Co. v. Old Sandstorm Annex Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Turley v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jensen v. BrooksNevada Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API