Legal Opinion

Parsons Drilling, Inc. v. Polar Resources Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 12864PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant, Parsons Drilling, Inc., challenges the trial court’s ruling that Parsons remit respondent Polar Resources Company’s downpayment made pursuant to a contract between the two parties.

On approximately May 25, 1979, both parties entered into a contract of sale for appellants’ drilling rig. Parsons had purchased the rig through Credit Alliance Corporation under a conditional sales contract.

In accordance with the terms of the parties’ contract, Polar gave Parsons a thirteen thousand dollar deposit in exchange for possessory rights in the rig. The contract specified that both…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bigler v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Gage v. PhillipsNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Grant v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rankin v. New England & Nevada Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Mortensen v. Berzell Investment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dickenson v. State, Dept. of WildlifeNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. SENTENEY BY SENTENEY v. Fire Ins. ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Flamingo Realty, Inc. v. Midwest Development, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Hilton Hotels U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995
  5. McBurney v. the GM CardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API