Goldfeder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtAdlerman, J.
This action is brought to recover the sum of $2,000, representing double indemnity benefits under a policy of fife *745insurance issued by the defendant on February 4, 1921, to one Abraham Goldfeder, in which the insured named his mother as beneficiary. The provision in said policy relating to the payment of double indemnity is as follows: “ The indemnity provided for herein shall be payable only if the death of the insured result in consequence of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means, within sixty days after such injury, independently and exclusively of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Wilkinson v. Ætna Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Smith v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Hutton v. States Accident InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fallins v. Durham Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Nallan v. Union Labor Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Agoado Realty Corp. v. United International InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Shtevelan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Milman v. Government Employees InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.