Legal Opinion
Milman v. Government Employees Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 23, 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtOliver G. Sutton, J.
Motions numbexed 9 and 23 axe consolidated hexewith and considexed togethex.
Plaintiff moves fox summaxy judgment in this action pxedicated upon the ‘1 medical payments ’ ’ pxovisions of a family automobile insuxance policy issued by defendant.
The cxitical facts axe not in dispute. Plaintiff’s infant daughtex, while a passengex in the vehicle covexed by the policy in question, was sexiously injuxed by the explosion of a pipe bomb device which had been placed undex the rear seat by “ a person ox pexsons unknown. ’ ’
The sole defense uxged by the defendant insuxex is that such an occuxxence is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Dorsey v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Distefano v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WhiteheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986