Bradley v. Milliken
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DeMASCIO, District Judge.
LULAC Council No. 11054 and the other named intervenors have filed a “Proposed Complaint in Intervention” and a separate “Motion To Intervene As Parties Plaintiff.” These proposed intervenors are individual children and organizations whose members include parents of Spanish-surnamed children participating in bilingual programs in the Detroit Public Schools. They seek intervention “to insure that the Bilingual Education programs they are entitled to receive do not suffer as a result of the implementation of a remedial plan in Region 2 or elsewhere .…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miss Florence Ella Hatton v. County Board of Education of Maury County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Gary L. Penick v. Columbus Education Association, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Robinson v. Shelby County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Usery v. BrandelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. State of Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980