Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Milliken

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 1, 1978No. Civ. A. 35257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DeMASCIO, District Judge.

LULAC Council No. 11054 and the other named intervenors have filed a “Proposed Complaint in Intervention” and a separate “Motion To Intervene As Parties Plaintiff.” These proposed intervenors are individual children and organizations whose members include parents of Spanish-surnamed children participating in bilingual programs in the Detroit Public Schools. They seek intervention “to insure that the Bilingual Education programs they are entitled to receive do not suffer as a result of the implementation of a remedial plan in Region 2 or elsewhere .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miss Florence Ella Hatton v. County Board of Education of Maury County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. Gary L. Penick v. Columbus Education Association, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Robinson v. Shelby County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Usery v. BrandelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  2. United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. State of Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API