Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Milliken

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1980No. 78-1598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

LULAC Council No. 11054, et al. appeal from the district court’s decision denying their application to intervene in the remedial phase of the Detroit school desegregation *1142case. We affirm the district court’s decision, but direct that appellants be permitted to intervene for the limited purpose of presenting evidence on a question not previously litigated in the district court.

Appellants sought to intervene in Bradley v. Milliken, Civ. No. 35257 (E.D.Mich.), in order to protect the interest of Detroit’s Hispanic students in receiving bilingual education. That interest, appellants felt, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ronald Bradley v. William G. Milliken, Governor, and Board of Education of the School District of the City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Tasby v. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States of America, Dr. Viola Coleman, Intervenors-Appellants v. Midland Independent School District and James H. Mailey, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Bradley v. MillikenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Mountain Top Condominium Association v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API