Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Dunbar v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 14, 1960No. 19,059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

Plaintiffs in error shall be referred to as the State and defendant in error as the Bank. The State suffered an adverse judgment relating to an inheritance tax assessment and seeks reversal by writ of error. It had filed a report of assessment based on values as of the date of death, refusing to revalue the assets of the estate based on the optional provisions of C.R.S. ’53, 138-4-67, as requested by the Bank. The action of the State in this respect was held by the trial court to be erroneous.

Said section in part provides:

“The executor, administrator or other personal representative of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Wisconsin Dept. of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. McElhone v. GerorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. Sleep Products, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COLORADO SPRINGSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API