Legal Opinion

People v. Bird

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1901No. Crim. No. 692PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw,j.

—This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction upon a charge of forgery. The facts sufficient for an understanding of the matters of law here presented for consideration will be found in the former appeal of People v. Bird, 124 Cal. 33.

Upon the trial of this cause, a witness, — Grove, the teller of the hank,—who had paid the money on the check presented by defendant, was admitted to be dead. He had testified at the preliminary examination of defendant, and upon two trials of this case. The prosecution offered, and there was admitted in evidence, the testimony of the deceased witness given…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. Chin HaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. OilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. WallinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. LintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MaljanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API