Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Power Conversion, Inc.

Mount Vernon City Court

Decided July 20, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sam Eisenberg, J.

In this summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, the respondent tenant appeared on the return date challenging the jurisdiction of the court because of alleged inadequate service and asserting a total offset against the rent claimed in the petition. Service was made by affixing a copy of the notice and petition upon a conspicuous part of the property sought to be recovered and by certified mailing of a copy to the respondent, all as required by RPAPL 735. With respect to the offset, the tenant asserted that the landlord had advised him that he did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maflo Holding Corp. v. S. J. Blume, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. 1405 Realty Corp. v. NapierCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. RossiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  4. Wayside Homes, Inc. v. UptonNew York District Court · 1963
  5. Turquoise Realty Corp. v. BurkeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. 16 Lincoln Square Associates v. Amrep Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API