Legal Opinion

1405 Realty Corp. v. Napier

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 24, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph P. Stjllivah, J.

This matter was submitted for a jurisdictional hearing on the issue whether “ due diligence ” to effect personal service of the notice and petition was first exercised by the process server before recourse was had to conspicuous place .service.

In a prior hearing on a traverse, jurisdiction achieved by conspicuous place service was sustained. However the issue *794of due diligence — not necessary to a conspicuous place service under section 735 of the Beal Property Actions and Proceedings Law — was not before the court. The issue now looms important because the landlord, on the tenants’ default in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Denning v. LettentyNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. RossiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  4. Wayside Homes, Inc. v. UptonNew York District Court · 1963
  5. Raymond v. GrotzNew York Justice Court · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oppenheim v. SpikeNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  3. City of New York v. Wall Street Racquet Club, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. Ressa Family, LLC v. DorfmanNassau County District Court · 2002
  5. Fairhaven Apts. No. 6, Inc. v. DolanSuffolk County District Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API