1405 Realty Corp. v. Napier
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph P. Stjllivah, J.
This matter was submitted for a jurisdictional hearing on the issue whether “ due diligence ” to effect personal service of the notice and petition was first exercised by the process server before recourse was had to conspicuous place .service.
In a prior hearing on a traverse, jurisdiction achieved by conspicuous place service was sustained. However the issue *794of due diligence — not necessary to a conspicuous place service under section 735 of the Beal Property Actions and Proceedings Law — was not before the court. The issue now looms important because the landlord, on the tenants’ default in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Denning v. LettentyNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. RossiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
- Wayside Homes, Inc. v. UptonNew York District Court · 1963
- Raymond v. GrotzNew York Justice Court · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oppenheim v. SpikeNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- City of New York v. Wall Street Racquet Club, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Ressa Family, LLC v. DorfmanNassau County District Court · 2002
- Fairhaven Apts. No. 6, Inc. v. DolanSuffolk County District Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.