Legal Opinion

Crouch & Son v. Parker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1919No. 23,604PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Johnson Circuit Court; Hugh L. Wickens, Special Judge. Action by Jeptha Crouch and others against Hanna Parker and Robert H. Parker on a note. From a judgment against Robert H. Parker, and in favor of Hanna Parker, the plaintiffs appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1399 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565).

1Opinion of the CourtWilloughby, J.

— On December 29, 1908, Crouch and Son, appellants, sold and delivered to Robert H. Parker, also named as appellant, a certain stallion at the agreed price of $1,950, for which sum the said Robert H. Parker and his mother, Hannah Parker, appellee, executed their three several promissory notes each calling for $650 and interest. As a part of the contract of sale, and contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of said notes, the said Crouch and Son, hereinafter designated as appellants, executed and delivered to said Robert H. Parker their written contract, by which they warranted said…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Magee v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Leggett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Indiana University v. Indiana Bonding & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Goeke v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Loudermilk v. CaseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Lutz v. Frick Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cook v. American States Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API